Net Radio and my efforts to save it

Talk about anything!

Moderator: Station Managers

Net Radio and my efforts to save it

Postby Mumon » Sat May 05, 2007 6:11 am

Some of you may remember me, as an old avid listener of GSP. I have never given up my like for GSP and continue to do what I can for this station and all stations.

Near the start of the year I learned that the way online radio will be done in the future will be changed and possibly for the worse for many online stations. My decision was to write to whom ever I could think to write to. This is the reply that I received from Congressman Mike Rogers:

Dear Mr. Poxson:

Thank you for taking the time to contact me regarding your concern with the Copyright Royalty Board's (CRB) recent decision to increase the royalty rates charged to web-based music broadcasts. It is good to hear from you.

I understand your concern that federal copyright law has led to a potential double standard in royalty rates paid by web broadcasters versus traditional over-the-air radio. As you may know, the CRB is currently reviewing their previous decision and I am hopeful that a more amendable solution can be found. However, I also believe this case is another example of the need for fundamental reform of our national copyright system. A successful digital copyright system will have to be built on the principle of respect for the rights copyright holders, producers, broadcasters and consumers.

Again, thank you for taking the time to contact me. Please keep in touch.


So there you have it, that was my effort to keep net radio alive. If you are curious what message I sent to these people, you are out of luck, I don't remember. I'm sure there are records somewhere. My words aren't the important thing in this picture though. The thing that I feel is the important thing here is that the words spoken are heard when spoken. One person speaking words is great, but more speaking is better.
Image
(Kioko drew that.)
The crazy Cow Monster
(I should make a D&D monster of my self that is good for a party of six lvl 20 characters.)
User avatar
Mumon
 
Posts: 338
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 6:44 am
Location: MI

Postby Meenstreek » Sat May 05, 2007 6:30 am

ummmm......ya, we pretty much all have the same letters from our congressman that we also wrote.

Dear Cody,

Thank you for contacting my office regarding the recent rate hikes by the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB). It is an honor to represent the people of Eastern Washington and I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts with me.

As you know, on March 2, 2007 the CRB raised the royalties owed by both FCC-licensed broadcast stations that simulcast over the Internet and stand-alone Internet stations that stream music. This rate increase will apply from 2006 through 2010. The decision means a change in the way royalties are determined. They will now no longer be based on a percentage of revenue, but instead on a "per performance". This will mean rates will go up significantly over the next few years.

Because of the negative impact these fees will have on internet radio, National Public Radio officials have filed a petition for the CRB to reconsider their ruling. If they will not, many groups have pledged to take whatever legal action necessary to change the decision.

Because the CRB was created by Congress, and because of the detrimental effects this ruling is having on consumers and broadcasters, I will closely monitor this situation and look for appropriate ways to voice your concerns. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention.

Best Wishes,
Cathy McMorris Rodgers
Member of Congress

Dear Mr. Lundquist:

Thank you for contacting me regarding music royalty rates and how they affect Internet radio. I appreciate hearing from you on this issue.

As you know, the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) issued a ruling on March 9, 2007 that established a new structure of rates to be paid by commercial and noncommercial Internet radio webcasters. For commercial Internet radio webcasters, the CRB did not include any exceptions for “small” webcasters, or webcasters with small audiences. The CRB reasoned that no party had presented any evidence that could be used to create a different rate structure for “large” and “small” webcasters. As a result, all webcasters, regardless of their listening audience, will be subject to the new rates.

This ruling will affect many people who enjoy and listen to Internet radio, and many groups are informing Congress how this decision will affect their lives. I support open access for all consumers to the Internet, as well as efforts that increase innovation and competition on the Internet.

It is very likely that this issue will come up for consideration in the 110th Congress in order to deal with many different aspects of the CRB’s decision. If legislation is introduced, it will likely be considered in the Judiciary Committee, which I do not sit on. Rest assured, should legislation on this issue come up for debate in the full Senate, I will keep your views in mind.

Sincerely,

Patty Murray
United States Senator
User avatar
Meenstreek
Unstoppable!
 
Posts: 2291
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 3:01 am


Return to General/Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests