On Nihilism

I posted this on another forum that I frequent (that will remain undisclosed), and I figured that if I'm going to pour out my personal beliefs, I might as well fry a few more cortex's in the process.
WARNING: IF PHILOSOPHY ISN'T YOUR THING, SKIP THIS THREAD.
I went through several links that I've been reading, including a rather well-described but still rather meandering definition of nihilism at http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/n/nihilism.htm . It IS worth the read, if you're interested in the subject, but not as mandatory as the following in the understanding of nihilism.
I'll start with the first two paragraphs of "Nihilism Defined" by Freydis, and I'll tell you right from the start: These aren't my words, but they might as well be. I have yet to find a single passage by this man that is not EXACTLY structured towards my own views about life, society, and philosophy in general.
Please note that I did not set out in my search for nihilism looking for an idol, nor do I neccessarily consider Freydis an idol. He is someone who has elaborated on what I've been trying to determine for years, and who has apparently had the time to dig deep enough to formulate it as perfectly as he has. I consider Freydis a highly respected equal, so instead of heaping praise (albeit well-deserved praise) on him, I feel more obligated to apologize for using his words, instead of typing it out myself. That said...
Nihilism Defined
by Freydis
A common (but misleading) description of nihilism is the 'belief in nothing'. Instead, a far more useful one would substitute 'faith' for 'belief' where faith is defined as the "firm belief in something for which there is no proof." A universal definition of nihilism could then well be the rejection of that which requires faith for salvation or actualization and would span to include anything from theology to secular ideology. Within nihilism faith and similar values are discarded because they've no absolute, objective substance, they are invalid serving only as yet another exploitable lie never producing any strategically beneficial outcome. Faith is an imperative hazard to group and individual because it compels suspension of reason, critical analysis and common sense. Nietzsche once said that faith means not wanting to know. Faith is "don't let those pesky facts get in the way of our political plan or our mystically ordained path to heaven"; faith is "do what I tell you because I said so". All things that can't be disproved need faith, utopia needs faith, idealism needs faith, spiritual salvation needs faith. F**k faith.
The second element nihilism rejects is the belief in final purpose, that the universe is built upon non-random events and that everything is structured towards an eventual conclusive revelation. This is called teleology and it's the fatal flaw plaguing the whole rainbow of false solutions from Marxism to Buddhism and everything in between. Teleology compels obedience towards the fulfillment of "destiny" or "progress" or similar such grandiose goals. Teleology is used by despots and utopian dreamers alike as a coercive motivation leading only to yet another apocryphal apocalypse; the real way to lead humanity by the nose - tell them it's all part of the big plan so play along or else! It may even seem reasonable but there is not now and never has been any evidence the universe operates teleologically - there is no final purpose. This is the simple beauty nihilism has that no other idea-set does. By breaking free from the tethers of teleology one is empowered in outlook and outcome because for the first time it's possible to find answers without proceeding from pre-existing perceptions. We're finally free to find out what's really out there and not just the partial evidence to support original pretext and faulty notions only making a hell on earth in the process. So f**k teleology too.
The complete text (and if you found the above intriguing, or have issues with it's general point, I strongly urge you read on) can be found here: http://www.geocities.com/liudegast/nihilism.html
WARNING: IF PHILOSOPHY ISN'T YOUR THING, SKIP THIS THREAD.
I went through several links that I've been reading, including a rather well-described but still rather meandering definition of nihilism at http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/n/nihilism.htm . It IS worth the read, if you're interested in the subject, but not as mandatory as the following in the understanding of nihilism.
I'll start with the first two paragraphs of "Nihilism Defined" by Freydis, and I'll tell you right from the start: These aren't my words, but they might as well be. I have yet to find a single passage by this man that is not EXACTLY structured towards my own views about life, society, and philosophy in general.
Please note that I did not set out in my search for nihilism looking for an idol, nor do I neccessarily consider Freydis an idol. He is someone who has elaborated on what I've been trying to determine for years, and who has apparently had the time to dig deep enough to formulate it as perfectly as he has. I consider Freydis a highly respected equal, so instead of heaping praise (albeit well-deserved praise) on him, I feel more obligated to apologize for using his words, instead of typing it out myself. That said...
Nihilism Defined
by Freydis
A common (but misleading) description of nihilism is the 'belief in nothing'. Instead, a far more useful one would substitute 'faith' for 'belief' where faith is defined as the "firm belief in something for which there is no proof." A universal definition of nihilism could then well be the rejection of that which requires faith for salvation or actualization and would span to include anything from theology to secular ideology. Within nihilism faith and similar values are discarded because they've no absolute, objective substance, they are invalid serving only as yet another exploitable lie never producing any strategically beneficial outcome. Faith is an imperative hazard to group and individual because it compels suspension of reason, critical analysis and common sense. Nietzsche once said that faith means not wanting to know. Faith is "don't let those pesky facts get in the way of our political plan or our mystically ordained path to heaven"; faith is "do what I tell you because I said so". All things that can't be disproved need faith, utopia needs faith, idealism needs faith, spiritual salvation needs faith. F**k faith.
The second element nihilism rejects is the belief in final purpose, that the universe is built upon non-random events and that everything is structured towards an eventual conclusive revelation. This is called teleology and it's the fatal flaw plaguing the whole rainbow of false solutions from Marxism to Buddhism and everything in between. Teleology compels obedience towards the fulfillment of "destiny" or "progress" or similar such grandiose goals. Teleology is used by despots and utopian dreamers alike as a coercive motivation leading only to yet another apocryphal apocalypse; the real way to lead humanity by the nose - tell them it's all part of the big plan so play along or else! It may even seem reasonable but there is not now and never has been any evidence the universe operates teleologically - there is no final purpose. This is the simple beauty nihilism has that no other idea-set does. By breaking free from the tethers of teleology one is empowered in outlook and outcome because for the first time it's possible to find answers without proceeding from pre-existing perceptions. We're finally free to find out what's really out there and not just the partial evidence to support original pretext and faulty notions only making a hell on earth in the process. So f**k teleology too.
The complete text (and if you found the above intriguing, or have issues with it's general point, I strongly urge you read on) can be found here: http://www.geocities.com/liudegast/nihilism.html