Ear damage by MP3, DVD and digital television?
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2002 4:19 amGridStream Productions
http://forums.gridstream.org/forums/
Ear damage by MP3, DVD and digital television?
http://forums.gridstream.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2994
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2002 4:19 amPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2002 5:36 amWhaddya say? I guess I been listenin to too many MP3's...
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2002 8:04 pmWow, that article makes enough sense to be quite scary. I think I'll do some more reading on that.
Problem is, it's doubtful anyone in the industry will EVER take it seriously, considering the costs involved with trying to completely redesign the evolution of audio compression.
Problem is, it's doubtful anyone in the industry will EVER take it seriously, considering the costs involved with trying to completely redesign the evolution of audio compression.
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2002 10:50 amwho says it ll be made by the industry?
was it made in the first place by the industry?
was it made in the first place by the industry?
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2002 7:08 pmThe idea of sound compression was indeed started by the industry. While mp3 wasn't specifically designed by industry, it was recognized immediately as THE sound-compression standard.
So perhaps I should rephrase:
The people of the world are a bunch of bloody morons who wouldn't help to change the evolution of audio compression standards because they don't give a f*** about that article and probably don't believe a word of it. (e.g. See Thoughts on: Environmental Protection, Population Boom, Oil Company Dependancy)
So perhaps I should rephrase:
The people of the world are a bunch of bloody morons who wouldn't help to change the evolution of audio compression standards because they don't give a f*** about that article and probably don't believe a word of it. (e.g. See Thoughts on: Environmental Protection, Population Boom, Oil Company Dependancy)
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2002 7:41 pmI've always been biased towards lossless compression.
(i.e I prefer PNG over JPG even tough PNG is larger)
(I prefer uncompressed or redundancy compression over lossy mp3 etc)
same with video etc. DivX and DVD is cool, but lossy.
Problem is quality/non-lossy methods use so much storage space.
If it was up to me I'd love to see the GSP stream at
96khz stereo, uncompressed
But that wont happen until um 2096 I bet hehe....
(i.e I prefer PNG over JPG even tough PNG is larger)
(I prefer uncompressed or redundancy compression over lossy mp3 etc)
same with video etc. DivX and DVD is cool, but lossy.
Problem is quality/non-lossy methods use so much storage space.
If it was up to me I'd love to see the GSP stream at
96khz stereo, uncompressed
But that wont happen until um 2096 I bet
hehe....Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2002 8:28 pmthats cause we emigrated to rubi-ka.