EDIT: Stop being mean, Tarryk. Restating:
Celestyna wrote:Avatar = character with no stats,
I don't agree, being that whether or not a representation has statistics attached to it does not have any effect on the historical origin of how one would refer to that representation.
such as in virtual realities like Second Life.
Or Anarchy Online. Or any other virtual environment, whether or not it's based in 3d visuals.
See: MUDs, MUSHs, and MOOs. This is a term that's been around long before some 10-year-old made up the word "toon" because he didn't know what to call his "little guy" in Everquest.
As far as I see it, if your characters in MUD-based environments have all sorts of stats, no visual representation, and they are referred to as "avatars", not "toons", then why should it be any different for the generation of MMOs that brought the visual aspect to it? (and for that matter, why would it then be undone all over again when the "game" is removed from the representation? that makes even less sense to me.)
If it's a pointer to a RL person that exists in any virtual environment, no matter what kind it is, forums, chatlines, VR, VRG, MUD, MMO, what-have-you, it's an avatar.