The geek test

[Lauri]

Don't you DARE pack those away! I got a wee bit more than you, and I owe it, oddly enough, to Dr. Who and Warharmmer, that and quoting, living and breathing Monty Python!. I'm damn bloody proud, and if you're not... I shall say Ni to you!

I love my mini's a lot actually; I really need to get back to painting them, I still have a few I want to finish, before buying more. The sad thing is I don't even game with them. Well not at the moment, no time. I paint them for fun 'cause I'm an unloyal D&D geek who craves pewter!

[Mumon]

So one of the questions is do you own a van or station wagon with the next question being something about getting lad in the back of it...

Then later on in the subtraction part, it tells you to subtract points if you have actualy been laid in the back.

So my question is... what if the reason one has kept the van is that they got laid in the back and they think it might help in the future because it sure did help that first time. Is that realy geekiness? And should one then remove the points they got for thinking they might get laid in the back when they already have proof that it works?

And if the do, should one then add points for even thinking of that logic thus proving that they are more of a geek.

(PS: Tarryk and Metalynx it wasn't that van.)

[Boinky]

I think you missed the point Mumon - The first follow up question about the Station Wagon or Van "Thinking that you can get laid in the back of your station wagon or van" was an implied 'This will never happen if you are a true geek' - so the later point subtraction was due to having done that when clearly not being a geek(course I'm pointing out my geekitude while explaining this)

Oh and another thing I musta missed since I was looking at this at work.

I think maybe Maud'dib is his long lost Aunt or something

[The Irish Guy]

3010.

Ha.